ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2024
Efficacy of Sarcupyrine/valsartan in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using meta-analysis methods.
methodsRelevant papers on sacubitril/valsartan for treating AMI were searched on PubMed, Embase, Medical Literature Analysis, and Retrieval System On-Line (MEDLINE), Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). The time range was from their inception to February 1, 2023.
resultsA total of 10 articles involving 13,135 patients were included for this meta-analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these patients, 6,581 were treated with sacubitril/valsartan, as the experimental group, and the other 6,554 patients were classified into the control group. After treatment, the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88,
conclusionSacubitril/Valsartan improves cardiac function in patients with AMI, reduces the risk of postoperative myocardial reinfarction, and reduces the risk of hospitalization for HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.