ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Prognostic factors in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of minimally invasive puncture and drainage.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Stereotactic Hematoma Evacuation for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and the Value of Multimodal Monitoring.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Postoperative Rebleeding: The Sword of Damocles in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of 6-month functional recovery in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage: insights from XGBoost and SHAP analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of 3D slicer-assisted minimally invasive thrombolysis combined with soft channel drainage versus craniotomy: a retrospective study in moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors in patients with acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) undergoing minimally invasive puncture and drainage, providing scientific evidence to enhance clinical treatment strategies.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 350 patients with acute HICH treated at Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the First People's Hospital of Lanzhou City from March 2017 to January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical method: the control group (n = 211) received traditional craniotomy, while the observation group (n = 139) underwent minimally invasive puncture and drainage. Functional scores, inflammatory markers, clinical efficacy, surgical time, first hematoma clearance rate, and hospitalization duration were compared between the groups. Patients were classified into poor prognosis (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score < 3) and improved prognosis (GOS score ≥ 3) groups. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for poor prognosis and examined their interaction with patient outcomes.
resultsPostoperative functional scores (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, GOS score, and Barthel Index) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)) were significantly lower post-treatment in the observation group compared to those in the control group (all P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (P = 0.003, OR = 0.573), time from onset to admission (P = 0.026, OR = 0.535), duration of hypertension (P = 0.006, OR = 1.766), and postoperative IL-6 levels (P = 0.048, OR = 1.870) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Prognosis was statistically associated with age (P = 0.040, OR = 0.978), time from onset to admission (P = 0.022, OR = 0.956), duration of hypertension (P = 0.022, OR = 1.085), and post-treatment IL-6 levels (P = 0.043, OR = 1.030).
conclusionMinimally invasive puncture and drainage offer superior neurological recovery, reduced inflammatory response, and improved long-term prognosis compared to traditional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.