ArticleBrain communications2024
Overcoming genetic neuromuscular diagnostic pitfalls in a middle-income country.
Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the diagnostic gap through deep phenotyping.Human genomics · 2026Article
- EGR2 gene mutations: lessons learned from 4 cases.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromuscular disorders affect almost 20 million people worldwide. Advances in molecular diagnosis have provided valuable insights into neuromuscular disorders, allowing for improved standards of care and targeted therapeutic approaches. Despite this progress, access to genomic diagnosis remains scarce and inconsistent in middle-income countries such as Brazil. The lack of public health policies to enable feasible genetic diagnosis and the shortage of neuromuscular disorders specialists are the main reasons in this process. We report our experience in a transcontinental genomic consortium for neuromuscular disorders highlighting how collaborative efforts have helped overcome various obstacles in diagnosing our patients. We describe several challenging cases categorized into three major themes, underlining significant gaps in genetic diagnosis: (i) reverse phenotyping and variant validation, (ii) deep phenotyping and identifying a bespoke molecular approach, and (iii) exploring the use of genomic tests beyond whole exome sequencing. We applied a qualitative case-based approach to exemplify common pitfalls in genomic diagnosis in a middle-income country. Our experience has shown that establishing a virtual transcontinental partnership is viable, offering effective exchange of scientific experiences, providing both guidance for rational decision-making and specialized training on a local level and access to diverse molecular diagnosis strategies and functional analyses. Collaborative efforts such as these have the potential to overcome local obstacles, strengthen scientific capabilities, foster diverse multi-ethnic cohorts, and ultimately provide improved care for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.