ArticleCureus2024
A Study on Hollow Viscus Perforation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Article
- Assessment of intestinal obstruction: Clinical presentation, pathological findings and management.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hollow viscus perforation refers to the perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, including the stomach, intestines, or other hollow organs, leading to leakage of the contents into the peritoneal cavity. This paper aims to explore the disease burden of hollow viscus perforation in Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital in Chennai, India, and its relation to patients' age and sex and analyze the etiology of hollow viscus perforation. Materials and methods This single-center retrospective study was conducted between May 2022 and August 2023, with a sample size of 100 patients. Data were extracted from the hospital's medical records based on the study's parameters. Results Our study shows that among the study group, hollow viscus perforation was more common in males (n = 78; 78%) than females. The highest incidence was observed in the 41-50 age group (n = 35; 35%), with the mean age being 43 years. The most common cause of perforation was a duodenal ulcer. Wound infection was the most frequent postoperative complication, affecting less than one-third of the patients (n = 29; 29%), followed by pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Although large intestinal pathology affected only eight patients in the sample, it showed a high case fatality rate, with one-quarter of the patients (n = 2; 25%) succumbing to the condition. Conclusion Hollow viscus perforation is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The etiology is diverse, ranging from peptic ulcer disease and malignancy to trauma and inflammatory conditions. Early diagnosis and aggressive management are essential for improving the outcome for patients with this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.