Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544602›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Evolving Techniques and Trends in Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedures in Implant Dentistry: A Review of Contemporary Advances.

Mohammed S Alsharekh, Afnan A Almutairi, Aishah S Jahlan, Alanoud S Alhazani, Sarah M Almohaimeed, Lamya A Aljnoubi, Ghadah A AlGhamdi, Taif T AlBenyan, Shatha F Alduhyaman, Najla M Alnaffaie and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammed S AlsharekhProsthodontics, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, SAU.
Afnan A AlmutairiGeneral Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Aishah S JahlanGeneral Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Alanoud S AlhazaniPreventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, SAU.
Sarah M AlmohaimeedDentistry, Armed Forces Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Lamya A AljnoubiDentistry, Majmaah University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ghadah A AlGhamdiGeneral Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Taif T AlBenyanGeneral Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Shatha F AlduhyamanGeneral Dentistry, Dr. Abdulaziz Al Ajaji Dental Polyclinics Company, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Buraydah, SAU.
Najla M AlnaffaieDentistry, NEOM Community Advanced Health Center, Neom, SAU.
Abdulaziz M AltalhiDentistry, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most challenging aspects of planning implant rehabilitation for the posterior maxillary region are the pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and the resorption of the residual alveolar ridge. To address the first aspect, there are two primary modalities for sinus augmentation: the direct or lateral window technique and the indirect or crestal technique. Clinicians must possess comprehensive knowledge of the maxillary sinus anatomy and be able to diagnose pathognomonic abnormalities through presurgical imaging and investigations. This skill is essential for performing technique-sensitive augmentation of the maxillary sinus with or without using biomaterials such as bone grafts, membranes, and platelet concentrates. These materials help create a suitable bone bed for either simultaneous or delayed implant placement through various traditional and evolving modified sinus augmentation techniques. It is also critical to effectively elevate the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation surgery, as complications in this process can adversely affect implant survival and potentially lead to implant failure. This review explores various aspects of maxillary sinus augmentation, ranging from traditional methods to evolving contemporary techniques, and draws on existing literature to examine their advantages, limitations, indications, and contraindications.

Indexed as

dental implantsindirect sinus lift techniquemaxillary sinus augmentationschneiderian membranesinus lift surgery

Identifiers

PMID39544602
PMCPMC11560410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.