Rotator Cuff Repair by All-Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Technique: A Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcome.

backgroundRotator cuff tears can lead to debilitating shoulder function and impairment. Rotator cuff repair aims to eliminate pain and improve function with increased shoulder strength and range of motion. This study evaluated the differences between all-arthroscopic (AA) and mini-open (MO) repair procedures for rotator cuff tendon tears regarding clinical and functional outcomes.

methodsThis was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary care government Hospital in Kolkata, India, between March 2015 and September 2016 which evaluated 25 patients who had undergone all-arthroscopic surgery and 25 patients who underwent mini-open repair (total of 50 patients) for rotator cuff tear with a minimum one-year follow-up. The UCLA score was used to assess the functional outcome of these patients.

resultsThe mean age of all patients included in this study was 45.32 years. 86% of patients were male. The two groups had similar demographic characteristics, pre-operative baseline parameters, and intra-op findings. The average UCLA score showed significant improvement from 13.92 pre-operatively to 29.76 at the final follow-up. The patients in the all-arthroscopic surgery group experienced a notable decrease in pain within the first three months compared to the mini-open group. However, at the time of the final follow-up, no significant difference was noted between both groups when comparing the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain, and active or passive glenohumeral motion.

conclusionThe outcomes of all-arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair surgery are equivocal in terms of both clinical and functional results, with no significant difference in post-operative pain, shoulder joint strength range of motion, or patient satisfaction over the long term.