ArticleCureus2024
Cough-Variant Asthma in a Myasthenia Gravis Patient on Treatment With Steroids and Rituximab.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle weakness that worsens on exercise and improves on resting is the hallmark of myasthenia gravis (MG), an uncommon autoimmune illness. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressants, and corticosteroids are commonly used in treatment. Rituximab has been tried in refractory patients. On the contrary, asthma is characterized by a persistent inflammation of the airways and a range of symptoms, including cough-variant asthma (CVA), in which the main symptom is only cough. We describe the case of a female in her 30s who had a history of MG and had been treated with steroids and rituximab. The patient had an acute dry cough in bouts. Spirometry revealed no obstructive or restrictive pattern, and the chest X-ray was normal. Based on allergy diathesis, a diagnosis of CVA was hypothesized and confirmed clinically by the patient's reaction to long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids. This case emphasizes how difficult it can be to diagnose respiratory symptoms in MG patients and how crucial it is to rule out CVA as a differential diagnosis, particularly in patients who have recently started immunomodulatory medication and have an allergy tendency. Fast symptom relief and positive clinical results were achieved by the efficient use of inhalation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.