ArticleCureus2024
Retrospective, Observational, Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Goel's Technique of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Carcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a substitute for the abdominal hysterectomy technique for endometrial carcinoma. Goel's technique is a unique laparoscopic hysterectomy. The main feature of Goel's technique is that vaginal manipulators or myoma screws are not used in the procedure as vaginal manipulators or myoma screws contribute to an increased risk of spread of malignancy in the systemic circulation. Methods In this retrospective, observational, pilot, single-centre study, the patient's baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and assessment and outcome measures of Goel's technique of laparoscopic hysterectomy were recorded. The following metrics were used to assess the postoperative recovery: average time to discharge the patients after the surgery; postoperative complications/pain assessment; correlation between pain and day of hospital discharge; association between the day of discharge and postoperative pain assessment; association between operation time and complications. Results A total of 35 female patients with early-stage endometrial cancer were included, their mean age being 56.29 years. The mean time to hospital discharge of the patients was 2.94 days. Of the cases, 2.9% had a ureteral injury and ureterovaginal fistula as complications, which were resolved during the follow-up period. On day one, the mean pain score decreased significantly to 50% from day zero (D0), and on day two, the mean pain score showed a significant fall of 91.5% from D0. Ten patients with a mean pain assessment score of 3.60 at D0 were released on the second day, 20 patients with a mean score of 3.80 at D0 were released on the second day, and five patients with a mean score of 5.60 at D0 were released at ≥ four days. Not a single patient developed any wound infection, dehiscence, or herniation for six months. Conclusion Goel's technique helped patients with endometrial carcinoma to recover faster and it reduced hospital stays with fewer postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.