ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Method: Herein, we conducted extensive comparative transcriptome and physiological studies on two distinct Results: Our findings revealed that cultivar G1 exhibited enhanced retention of proline and chlorophyll, alongside a marked elevation in peroxidase activity, coupled with diminished levels of malondialdehyde and reduced leaf relative electrolyte leakage compared with cultivar W1. This suggested that cultivar G1 had relatively higher protective enzyme activity and ROS quenching capacity. We discerned a total of 21,535 expressed genes and identified 4,192 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Our analysis revealed that 1,764 DEGs unique to G1 underwent thorough annotation and functional categorization utilizing diverse databases. Under drought conditions, the DEGs in G1 were predominantly linked to starch and sucrose metabolic pathways, plant hormone signaling, and glutathione metabolism. Notably, the drought-responsive genes in G1 were heavily implicated in hormonal modulation, such as ABA receptor3-like gene ( Conclusion: Our research provides novel insights into the physiological adaptations of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.