Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544509›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2024

Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview.

Nark-Kyoung Rho, Hyun-Seok Kim, Soo-Young Kim, Won Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Split Face Study Comparing the Effect of a PDLLA Based Product and PLLA on the Nasolabial Fold (NLF).Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nark-Kyoung RhoDepartment of Dermatology Center, Leaders Aesthetic Laser and Cosmetic Surgery Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0341-3460
Hyun-Seok KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Kim Hyun Seok Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Young KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Ichon Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-8506
Won LeeScientific Faculty of Minimal Invasive Plastic Surgery Association Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-0198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging-related changes in the skin, such as dullness, dehydration, and loss of elasticity, significantly affect its appearance and integrity. Injectable "skin boosters," comprising various biological materials, have become increasingly prominent in addressing these issues, offering rejuvenation and revitalization. This review offers a comprehensive examination of these injectables, detailing their types, mechanisms of action, and clinical uses. It also evaluates the evidence for their effectiveness and safety in treating age-related skin alterations and other conditions. The goal is to provide an insightful understanding of injectable skin boosters in contemporary dermatological practice, summarizing the current state of knowledge.

Indexed as

amino acidbotulinum neurotoxincollagenhyaluronic acidintradermal injectionneedle-free jet injectorpolycaprolactonepolydeoxyribonucleotidepoly-(lactic acid)skin booster

Identifiers

PMID39544509
PMCPMC11560330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.