Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544495›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Serum-Free Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine (PVRV-NG2) Using a Simulated Postexposure Zagreb Regimen With Human Rabies Immunoglobulin in Adults in Thailand.

Danaya Chansinghakul, Terapong Tantawichien, Kriengsak Limkittikul, Winai Ratanasuwan, Yuancheng Wang, Celine Petit, Francoise Guinet-Morlot, Carina Frago, Andrea-Clemencia Pineda-Peña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danaya ChansinghakulGlobal Clinical Development Strategy, Sanofi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Terapong TantawichienFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-5118
Kriengsak LimkittikulFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-6530
Winai RatanasuwanFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-5153
Yuancheng WangGlobal Biostatistical Sciences, Sanofi, Chengdu, China.
Celine PetitGlobal Immunology, Sanofi, Marcy l'Étoile, France.
Francoise Guinet-MorlotNew Vaccine Portfolio/Project Strategy & Execution, Sanofi, Marcy l'Étoile, France.
Carina FragoGlobal Clinical Development Strategy, Sanofi, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2450-6420
Andrea-Clemencia Pineda-PeñaGlobal Clinical Development Strategy, Sanofi, Marcy l'Étoile, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-0506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A serum-free, highly purified Vero rabies vaccine-next generation (PVRV-NG2) is under development. We conducted a phase III trial to describe the safety and immunogenicity profile of PVRV-NG2 compared with those of licensed purified Vero rabies vaccine (PVRV) in a simulated rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) Zagreb regimen in Thailand. Methods: Healthy adults aged ≥18 years (n = 201) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive PVRV-NG2 or PVRV in a rabies PEP Zagreb (days 0, 7, 21 [2-1-1]) regimen, with concomitant human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) at day 0. Immunogenicity end points included the proportion of participants with rabies virus-neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers ≥0.5 IU/mL at days 0, 14, and 35. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Results: A total of 199 participants completed the study (PVRV-NG2 n = 133, PVRV n = 66). In the PVRV-NG2 group and PVRV group, respectively, 91.0% (95% CI, 84.1%-95.6%) and 94.6% (95% CI, 85.1%-98.9%) had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL at day 14, increasing to 100% (95% CI, 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 93.5%-100%) by day 35. The vaccines had similar safety profiles, and there were no safety concerns. Conclusions: PVRV-NG2 showed acceptable safety and immunogenicity profiles when co-administered with HRIG in a simulated PEP Zagreb regimen in healthy adults in Thailand.

Indexed as

immunogenicitypostexposure prophylaxisrabiessafetyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39544495
PMCPMC11561577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.