SynthesisFrontiers in radiology2024
Predicting IDH and ATRX mutations in gliomas from radiomic features with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative radiomics models using CT and MRI for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Astrocytomas: Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Advance.MedComm · 2026Review
- AI-powered radiogenomics: imaging-driven diagnosis and discovery of cancer's molecular and cellular landscape.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
- IDH Mutation Assessment in Gliomas from Anatomical MRI Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Centralized and Federated Learning Frameworks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in glioma management: integrating neuroimaging and hematologic biomarkers for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Explainable diffusion-perfusion radiomics using apparent diffusion coefficient and arterial spin labeling for ATRX status prediction in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Explainable incremental-value analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and arterial spin labeling radiomics for ATRX status prediction in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Single-cell RNA-seq reveals gene expression heterogeneity in NSCLC and its link to the immune microenvironment.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of ML algorithms in predicting ATRX and IDH mutation status in patients with glioma through the analysis of radiomic features extracted from medical imaging. The potential clinical impacts and areas for further improvement in non-invasive glioma diagnosis, classification and prognosis are also identified and discussed. Methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic and Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. Databases including PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, Medline, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Additionally, meta-regression identified covariates contributing to heterogeneity before a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled sensitivities, specificities and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for the prediction of ATRX and IDH mutations. Results: Eleven studies involving 1,685 patients with grade I-IV glioma were included. Primary contributors to heterogeneity included the MRI modalities utilised (conventional only vs. combined) and the types of ML models employed. The meta-analysis revealed pooled sensitivities of 0.682 for prediction of ATRX loss and 0.831 for IDH mutations, specificities of 0.874 and 0.828, and AUC values of 0.842 and 0.948, respectively. Interestingly, incorporating semantics and clinical data, including patient demographics, improved the diagnostic performance of ML models. Conclusions: The high AUC in the prediction of both mutations demonstrates an overall robust diagnostic performance of ML, indicating the potential for accurate, non-invasive diagnosis and precise prognosis. Future research should focus on integrating diverse data types, including advanced imaging, semantics and clinical data while also aiming to standardise the collection and integration of multimodal data. This approach will enhance clinical applicability and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.