ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Evaluation of YOLO-Based Models for Automated Detection of Osteophytes and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL) in Sagittal Cervical CT Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Post-traumatic Exacerbation of Grade II L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis Requiring Surgical Stabilization.Cureus · 2026Article
- Surgical and non-surgical management of spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Spondylolysis is a lysis of the pars interarticularis, a component of the posterior arch of the vertebral body, in the face of repeated overuse and stress phenomena generally associated with sports in children and adolescent patients. This entity is one of the most common causes of low back pain in this age group. The diagnosis can be made using various imaging techniques, with computed tomography (CT) being considered the gold standard, as it provides the best visualization of the fracture, its extension and orientation, as well as an assessment of the entire bony skeleton. It is essential to understand the physiopathology and natural evolution of the disease as well as to know the typical findings of this disease in each imaging technique in order to be able to make a diagnosis in early stages of the disease. In this paper, we will review the clinical manifestations and typical radiologic findings of spondylolisthesis and spondylolisthesis, which allow a correct and early diagnosis. Methods: The literature available in English from 1976 (when the first publications on the diagnosis of this pathology appeared) up to the present day has been used for this review. Key Content and Findings: In this review we will review the etiology, etiopathogenesis and natural evolution of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, we will place special emphasis on the radiological findings in magnetic resonance imaging with a view to an early diagnosis that allows us to slow down the evolution of the disease in its initial stages and we will look at the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Conclusions: Spondylolysis is an increasingly frequent entity due to the increase in sporting activity at younger and younger ages, so radiologists should consider its existence in patients with low back pain and know the radiological signs that allow us to make an early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.