ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging applications in pediatric musculoskeletal tumors.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovations in pediatric imaging: a scoping review of the past decade with case illustrations.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Current Position of Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Primary Bone Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Will PET/MR Imaging Replace PET/CT for Pediatric Applications?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Primary Bone Tumours: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hybrid imaging positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) is an important tool in the management of pediatric oncology patients, particularly in malignant musculoskeletal pathologies, because it combines the functional and metabolic information of tumor provided by PET with the high soft-tissue contrast and the functional information offered by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We performed an observational retrospective study that included pediatric patients diagnosed with primary bone or soft-tissue sarcomas in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit at the HM Montepríncipe University Hospital, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid (Spain) who underwent whole-body Results: Seventy-one Conclusions: PET/MR has represented a significant advancement in the evaluation of pediatric malignant neoplasms, with specific applications in musculoskeletal tumors showing clear benefits over PET/CT. The primary advantage is the reduction in ionizing radiation doses and the assessment of soft tissues, making it an excellent option for malignant musculoskeletal pathologies in pediatric patients who often require long-term follow-up. It is particularly useful for early tumor detection and functional therapy monitoring in oncology. The development of new protocols is making studies increasingly faster and better tolerated, even without the need for anesthesia. PET/MRI has shown to increase diagnostic accuracy in primary bone and soft tissue tumors, as it allows for the comprehensive evaluation of their morpho-metabolic characteristics, locoregional, and distant involvement in a single study. It is also useful in surgical planning and post-treatment follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.