ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Minimally invasive interventional guided imaging therapies of musculoskeletal tumors.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventional Radiology in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Tumours.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors, which include both bone and soft tissue tumors, have been managed as distinct entities. The incidence of metastases, particularly bone metastasis, in patients with MSK tumors can result in the emergence of significant complications such as pain, impairment of vital anatomical structures, or pathological fractures. Given these issues, a diverse team of experts is typically engaged in intricate treatment decision-making concerning the necessity of surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or a mix of these methodologies. Nevertheless, percutaneous image-guided minimally invasive interventional therapy for MSK tumors represent a promising approach for treating such tumors. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in this technique, leading to its growing acceptance in ordinary clinical practice. MSK tumors can be effectively treated by the use of ablation techniques, either as standalone procedures or in conjunction with other percutaneous treatments. Various image-guided techniques have been employed to observe the ablation zone and nearby structures, such as fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, CT is the favored method due to its widespread availability and ability to visualize the tumor and its environs. The procedures employed include ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, and magnetic resonance (MR)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). The technique can be performed in combination with cementation, with or without additional metallic stabilizing devices, depending on the location of the lesion. Improved local tumor control can be attained by combining ablation with bland embolization or transarterial chemoembolization. This article provides an overview of the fundamental elements of minimally invasive interventional guided imaging therapy for MSK malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.