ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2025
Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 2: Special Issues and Considerations.
Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structuring medico-legal autopsy data for public health surveillance using the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Forensic pathologists routinely testify in courts of law as part of their occupation. As such, part of their training involves learning how to testify responsibly and competently. As experts, they are permitted to offer opinions in order to assist the triers of fact. Results: This review examines such concepts as burden of proof by manner of death, mechanisms of death, survival intervals, and the differences between possibilities, probabilities, and reasonable degree of medical certainty. It also addresses legal concepts and issues that may arise in court, including those of pain and suffering, cognitive bias, objections, attempts at witness impeachment, and surrogate witness testimony, as well as a summary of pertinent case law. Discussion: The special issues and considerations of the expert forensic pathologist are discussed with the aim to summarize some of the key issues that may arise in court for the forensic pathologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.