Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544439›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials research2024

The fabrication of freestanding complex oxide membranes: Can we avoid using water?

Dae-Sung Park, Nini Pryds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Strain evolution andRSC advances · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dae-Sung ParkDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 310, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Nini PrydsDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 310, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5718-7924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in fabricating scalable two-dimensional or freestanding functional materials have shown promise for their use in modern silicon-based electronics and future technologies. A growing interest is in creating freestanding complex oxide membranes using new methods like epitaxial lift-off and mechanical exfoliation to enhance their quality and integrity. Despite these advances, it remains challenging to consistently produce high-quality freestanding oxide membranes on a large scale for practical use. This perspective paper provides an overview of release-and-transfer techniques for fabricating freestanding single-crystalline complex oxide layers, which are initially grown epitaxially. Specifically, we systematically explore the advantages and disadvantages of water-assisted exfoliation of freestanding oxide layers, which have been widely adopted using a water-soluble sacrificial layer in recent years. Furthermore, we compare this approach with other methods to navigate future directions in oxide layer transfer technology, considering material selections, fabrication processes, and functionalization strategies. Graphical abstract: Seeking a water-free epitaxial lift-off process: (1) Growth: An epitaxial film is grown on a sacrificial layer placed on a single-crystal substrate (top left). (2) Release: The film is released from the substrate without using a water-based sacrificial layer (top right). (3) Transfer: The film is transferred onto a new platform (bottom right). (4) Support Removal: A polymer support is removed from the film (bottom left).

Indexed as

Complex oxideEpitaxial lift-offFreestanding oxideRelease and transferSacrificial layerThin films

Identifiers

PMID39544439
PMCPMC11557645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.