Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544424›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Digital competence of faculty members in health sciences measured

Halil Ersoy, Cigdem Baskici, Aydan Aytar, Raimonds Strods, Nora Jansone Ratinika, António Manuel Lopes Fernandes, Hugo Neves, Aurelija Blaževičienė, Alina Vaškelytė, Camilla Wikström-Grotell and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Halil ErsoyComputer Education and Instructional Technology, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1598-7656
Cigdem BaskiciDepartment of Healthcare Management, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Aydan AytarGulhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
Raimonds StrodsCentre for Educational Growth, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-9283
Nora Jansone RatinikaCentre for Educational Growth, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
António Manuel Lopes FernandesNursing School of Coimbra, Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Hugo NevesNursing School of Coimbra, Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Aurelija BlaževičienėDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Alina VaškelytėDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Camilla Wikström-GrotellGraduate School and Research, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Heikki PaakkonenAdvanced Clinical Care, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne SöderlundSchool of Health Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västrås, Sweden.
Johanna FritzSchool of Health Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västrås, Sweden.
Sultan KavDepartment of Nursing, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This descriptive study aims to determine the digital competence level of faculty members who teach in the health sciences, empirically considering possible contextual aspects. Two data collection instruments were used: a self-reflection questionnaire to assess digital competence, and a survey querying demographics and aspects of teaching and learning context. In total, 306 health sciences faculty members from six universities voluntarily participated the study. The results revealed that a majority of the faculty members have intermediate (integrator or expert) level of digital competence, which is described as being aware of the potential use of digital technology in teaching and having a personal repertoire for its use under various circumstances. Age, digital teaching experience, perception of work environment, and previous teaching experience in fully- or partially-online courses were identified as influencing factors for digital competence. Faculty members in health sciences were able to integrate digital technologies in their teaching practices. Health education institutions may facilitate the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning environments. Moreover, institutions or stakeholders should consider that digital competence requires practice and experience in meaningfully-designed digital environments and tools.

Indexed as

FacultyAdultDigital TechnologyEducation, DistanceFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional CompetenceSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital competenceDigital technologyFaculty membersHealth sciencesTeaching

Identifiers

PMID39544424
PMCPMC11562777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.