ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Safety and efficacy of combined acetabular reconstruction and microwave ablation in the treatment of periacetabular metastatic disease: a retrospective clinical evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Percutaneous Stabilization for Pelvic Metastatic Bone Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- [Current status and future directions of stability reconstruction following spinal tumor resection].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The periacetabular bone defects caused by metastatic disease often necessitate acetabular reconstruction and various techniques have been employed with varying degrees of success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acetabular reconstruction in conjunction with adjuvant microwave ablation as a surgical intervention for patients with periacetabular metastases. Methods: Between January 2019 and September 2023, 17 consecutive patients with different tumor subtypes required surgical intervention for periacetabular metastases. The acetabular reconstruction was performed by utilizing an acetabular reconstructive cage and cement total hip arthroplasty with microwave ablation. A retrospective review was performed to assess pain relief, intraoperative details and postoperative complications. Functional status following procedures was determined by the 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the overall survival of patients was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 8 males and 9 females were included with an average age of 48.6 years (range 34-66). Patients reported a significant improvement in the level of pain and the mean VAS score declined from 7.7 preoperatively to 2.2 postoperatively. Of the 17 patients, 16 could ambulate either independently (6 patients) or using a walking aid (10 patients) with a mean MSTS score of 18.9. The median follow-up was 9.0 months. Nine patients were alive at the most recent follow-up with overall survival of 40.9% at 12 months and 30.7% at 36 months, respectively. Conclusion: In selected patients with periacetabular metastasis, the utilization of an acetabular cage and cement total hip arthroplasty presents a less invasive reconstruction technique. The incorporation of adjuvant microwave ablation has shown promise in providing long-lasting pain relief, reducing intraoperative bleeding, and improving local tumor control. However, further research and extended follow-up are necessary to establish the effectiveness of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.