ArticlePain reports2024
Why might fears and worries persist after a pain education-grounded multimodal intervention for chronic back pain? A qualitative study.
Article in Pain reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect Modifiers of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the RESOLVE Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- [Pain neuroscience education as an intervention to improve quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain : A scoping review of randomised controlled trials].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- General practitioners' experiences of managing low back pain in primary care in Ireland: A qualitative phenomenological study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The effect of pain education (PE) on pain intensity and function diminishes after a few months in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). One possible explanation is the return of underlying fears and worries related to the condition. Objective: To explore topics related to participants' beliefs and feelings that might explain why fears and worries persist after a PE-grounded intervention for CLBP. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with participants from the active arm of a randomised controlled trial who received an individualised PE-grounded intervention for adults with CLBP. We used reflexive thematic analysis with an inductive approach. Results: Twenty participants were interviewed (9 women and 11 men, median age = 54 years, median pain duration = 4 years, 13 reporting at least 30% pain reduction on the trial primary outcome). Three themes were identified: 1) "Are you implying my pain is not real?": a few participants believed the validity of their pain was being questioned. 2) "You don't understand, my pain is different": most participants considered the influence of an altered nervous system but did not exclude the possibility of having structural and biomechanical influences for the persistence of their back pain. 3) "I am unsure how to fit it into my daily life": fear and worries persisted when participants could not figure out how to apply an alternative way of making sense of pain in their daily lives. Conclusion: Patients' perceptions about PE should be monitored and might be addressed with communication strategies, educational content that matches patients' characteristics, and reinforcements over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.