Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39544108›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology ecology2024

Microfluidics for studying the deep underground biosphere: from applications to fundamentals.

Sandy Morais, Emeline Vidal, Anaïs Cario, Samuel Marre, Anthony Ranchou-Peyruse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandy MoraisCNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, ICMCB, F-33600 Pessac Cedex, France.
Emeline VidalCNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, ICMCB, F-33600 Pessac Cedex, France.
Anaïs CarioCNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, ICMCB, F-33600 Pessac Cedex, France.
Samuel MarreCNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, ICMCB, F-33600 Pessac Cedex, France.
Anthony Ranchou-PeyruseUniversite de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, E2S UPPA, CNRS, IPREM, 64000 Pau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-9805

Funding

European Research Council 725100French National Research Agency ANR-21-CE01-0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, selected examples are presented to demonstrate how microfluidic approaches can be utilized for investigating microbial life from deep geological environments, both from practical and fundamental perspectives. Beginning with the definition of the deep underground biosphere and the conventional experimental techniques employed for these studies, the use of microfluidic systems for accessing critical parameters of deep life in geological environments at the microscale is subsequently addressed (high pressure, high temperature, low volume). Microfluidics can simulate a range of environmental conditions on a chip, enabling rapid and comprehensive studies of microbial behavior and interactions in subsurface ecosystems, such as simulations of porous systems, interactions among microbes/microbes/minerals, and gradient cultivation. Transparent microreactors allow real-time, noninvasive analysis of microbial activities (microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, FTIR microspectroscopy, etc.), providing detailed insights into biogeochemical processes and facilitating pore-scale analysis. Finally, the current challenges and opportunities to expand the use of microfluidic methodologies for studying and monitoring the deep biosphere in real time under deep underground conditions are discussed.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsBacteriaEcosystemGroundwaterdeep underground ecosystemshigh pressuremicrofluidicsmicromodelsmicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID39544108
PMCPMC11650873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.