Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543872›Full record

ReviewCurrent gene therapy2025

Unraveling Glioblastoma: TME Implication and Gene Therapy Advances.

Rohith Raali, P K Suresh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rohith RaaliDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences & Technology, VIT University, Vellore Dt. PIN:632014, India.
P K SureshDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Biosciences & Technology, VIT University, Vellore Dt. PIN: 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-9217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a malignant manifestation of a solid brain tumour with a very dismal prognosis due to an overall median survival of 14 months. The currently administered Standard treatment plan, the STUPP regimen, is not very effective in tackling this neoplasia. A major concern that affects the development of new drug formulations, specifically for Glioma, is the inherent sub-clonal heterogeneity, which includes the dynamic and intricate nature of the Tumour Microenvironment (TME). Targeting the cellular niche using personalized medication for glioma specifically gene therapy, seems to be promising, with most studies in preclinical models yielding optimistic results. This paper analyses the great headways made in glioma gene therapy in the last 10 years while looking into different therapeutic strategies. That said, certain challenges do plague the clinical use of gene therapy which have been highlighted in the hopes that future researchers will address these concerns and further propel gene therapy in its journey from the Lab to the bedside.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGenetic TherapyGlioblastomaTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansgene therapyGlioblastomagliomahallmarks of cancerSTUPP regimen.TME

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.