Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543770›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

Review of the target trial methodological approach on treatment effect estimates in kidney failure: protocol for a systematic assessment.

Jule Pinter, David J Tunnicliffe, Pooshwikaa Karunikaikumar, Anastasios Anastasiadis, Robert K Hills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jule PinterUniversity Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. pinter_j@ukw.de.ORCID 0009-0007-8261-2586
David J TunnicliffeSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Camperdown, Australia.
Pooshwikaa KarunikaikumarJulius Maximillian University, Würzburg, Germany.
Anastasios AnastasiadisUniversity Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Robert K HillsNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with kidney failure often lack robust evidence because they are excluded from randomized trials. Trial emulation provides an alternative approach to derive treatment effect estimates when randomized trials cannot be conducted. Critical questions about the comparative efficacy and safety of interventions in kidney failure are now being answered using this approach or parts of it. However, variations and inconsistencies in reporting cast doubt on the reliability and validity of effect estimates not derived from randomized trials. The aim of this methodological systematic review is to understand the extent to which the target study approach is used in kidney failure and the appropriateness of this approach. By identifying and evaluating studies that qualify as emulating a target trial, compared with studies that did not apply the principles. We aim to provide more specific methodological guidance to increase the clarity and reliability of reporting treatment effect estimates when running a trial in kidney failure is not feasible.

methodsThis protocol is developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. MEDLINE, Embase, and reference lists (backwards citation chasing) will be searched up until 1st July 2023 and the search updated prior to publication to identify all studies evaluating patient outcomes in late-stage kidney disease and failure that use target trial emulation as the primary approach for analysis. Two authors (A. A., P. K.) will select articles based on title and abstract and then full text, with a third reviewer settling disagreements (J. P.). The prespecified variables will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be assessed by at least two authors (A. A., P. K., A. N.) using prespecified data forms. This will enable the determination of the robustness of the methodological quality of observational studies in using the whole or elements of the target trial approach. We will thereby assess their ability to reliably report treatment effect estimates. DISCUSSION: We will provide specific methodological recommendations on how to design target trials and model assumptions for emulation to get reliable treatment effect estimates for therapeutic interventions in kidney failure. METHODOLOGICAL SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: Identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z4Y29 .

Indexed as

Renal InsufficiencyResearch DesignHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSystematic Reviews as TopicKidney failureMethodological systematic reviewTarget trial emulation

Identifiers

PMID39543770
PMCPMC11566441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.