ArticleMicrobiome2024
Effect of plant-derived microbial soil legacy in a grafting system-a turn for the better.
Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic microbial communities mediate maize growth and soil microecology under saline-alkali stress.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- Metagenome analysis of Citrus sinensis rhizosphere infected with Candidatus liberibacter asiaticus reveals distinct structure in bacterial communities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Catch crop amendments and microbial inoculants differently modulate apple rhizosphere microbiomes and plant responses.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlant-soil feedback arises from microbial legacies left by plants in the soil. Grafting is a common technique used to prevent yield declines in monocultures. Yet, our understanding of how grafting alters the composition of soil microbiota and how these changes affect subsequent crop performance remains limited. Our experiment involved monoculturing ungrafted and grafted watermelons to obtain conditioned soils, followed by growing the watermelons on the conditioned soils to investigate plant-soil feedback effects.
resultsUngrafted plants grew better in soil previously conditioned by a different plant (heterospecific soil) while grafted plants grew better in soil conditioned by the same plant (conspecific soil). We demonstrated experimentally that these differences in growth were linked to changes in microorganisms. Using a supervised machine learning algorithm, we showed that differences in the relative abundance of certain genera, such as Rhizobium, Chryseobacterium, Fusarium, and Aspergillus, significantly influenced the conspecific plant-soil feedback. Metabolomic analyses revealed that ungrafted plants in heterospecific soil enriched arginine biosynthesis, whereas grafted plants in conspecific soil increased sphingolipid metabolism. Elsewhere, the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of ungrafted plants identified in heterospecific soil include Chryseobacterium and Lysobacter, microorganisms having been prominently identified in earlier research as contributors to plant growth. Metabolic reconstruction revealed the putative ability of Chryseobacterium to convert D-glucono-1,5-lactone to gluconic acid, pointing to distinct disease-suppressive mechanisms and hence distinct microbial functional legacies between grafted and ungrafted plants.
conclusionsOur findings show a deep impact of the soil microbial reservoir on plant growth and suggest the necessity to protect and improve this microbial community in agricultural soils. The work also suggests possibilities of optimizing microbiota-mediated benefits through grafting herein, a way that "engineered" soil microbial communities for better plant growth. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.