ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2024
Unpacking occupational and sex divides to understand the moderate progress in life expectancy in recent years (France, 2010's).
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving social determinants of health documentation in French electronic health records using large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe growth in life expectancy (LE) slows down recently in several high-income countries. Among the underlying dynamics, uneven progress in LE across social groups has been pointed out. However, these dynamics has not been extensively studied, partly due to data limitations. In this paper, we explore this area for the 2010 decade using recent French data.
methodsWe utilize the recent change in French census mortality follow-up data (EDP) and apply P-spline models to estimate LEs across five occupational classes (OCs) and indicators of lifespan heterogeneity (edagger) within these OCs, for seven triennial periods (2011-2013 to 2017-2019).
resultsFirst, we found a similar ranking of OCs along the LE gradient over time and across sexes, from manual workers to higher-level OCs. Noteworthy, the lowest LE in women overlaps with the highest one in men drawing a sex-OC gradient. Second, we observe varying progress of LEs. In women, LE increases in higher-level OCs meanwhile it levels off in manual workers, so that the OCs gap widens (up to 3.4 years in 2017-2019). Conversely, in men LE stalls in higher-level OCs and increases in manual workers so that the gap, which is much larger than in women (+5.7 years in 2017-2019), is tending to narrow. Finally, the lifespan homogenizes in OCs only when LE is low.
conclusionOverall, the limited LE progress in France results from LE stalling in the middle of the sex-OC gradient, though LE increases at both ends. At the lower end, LE progress and lifespan homogenization suggest that laggards benefit recently improvements achieved earlier in other OCs. At the upper end, LE progress may come from a vanguard group within higher-lever OC, benefiting new sources of improvements. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore the diverse mortality dynamics coexisting in the current health landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.