ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024
Cost-effectiveness of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce the occurrence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the growing evidence on efficacy, little is known regarding the efficiency of Vitamin D supplementation (VDS) to reduce the incidence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children. This study aimed to determine the cost-utility of VDS to reduce the incidence rate of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children.
methodsA decision tree model was used to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of VDS in a patient aged 2 to 60 months with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia requiring in-hospital management. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US$5180.
resultsThe QALYs per person were 0,93 with VDS and 0,92 without VDS. The total costs per person were US$ 1148 for VDS and US$ 1284 without VDS. This position of absolute dominance of VDS makes it unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The ICER was sensitive to changes in the relative risk of Vitamin D supplementation.
conclusionIn conclusion, our study shows that VDS is a cost-effective to reduce the incidence rate of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children, from a societal perspective. However, the sensitivity of ICER to relative risk makes it necessary to take the results of this economic evaluation with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.