Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543618›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Arthroscopically assisted accurate location of the bone tunnel entrance for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction may be a better choice for patients with chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study.

Zechen Yan, Chen Zhuang, Wenhuan Chen, Yu Pan, Xiangke Wu, Rujie Zhuang, Wenxuan Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zechen Yan *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chen Zhuang *Alberta Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenhuan ChenOrthopedic Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Yu PanOrthopedic Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Xiangke WuOrthopedic Department, Quzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Hospital at the Junction of Four Provinces Affiliated to Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Rujie ZhuangOrthopedic Department, Quzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Hospital at the Junction of Four Provinces Affiliated to Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Quzhou, China. rujiezhuang@163.com.
Wenxuan GuoOrthopedic Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China. guowenxuan2019@163.com.

Funding

Quzhou City Science and Technology Project No. 2022K75Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Scientific Research Fund Project No. 2021FSYYZZ09Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Project No. 2022497035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anatomical location for lateral ligament reconstruction remains a significant challenge. With the development of arthroscopic technology, arthroscopic-assisted lateral ligament reconstruction can significantly facilitate the correct localization of anatomical points. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic ligament reconstruction compared with percutaneous ligament reconstruction.

methodsThis study included 72 patients who underwent lateral ligament reconstruction for chronic lateral ankle instability from 2018 to 2022. The follow-up duration in the percutaneous(n = 35) and the arthroscopic(n = 37) groups was 6-30 months. The patients were evaluated before the operation, at 6 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), Karlsson-Peterson score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated at each time point. The complications and the time required to return to sports were documented during the follow-up.

resultsAll clinical evaluations significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the AOFAS score, VAS score, and complications. The Karlsson-Peterson score (85.4 vs 83.6, p = 0.044), surgical duration (50.4 min vs 60.2 min, p < 0.001), and time to return to sports (17.8 weeks vs 20.5 weeks, p = 0.033) were all improved in the arthroscopic group.

conclusionSatisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved through both arthroscopic and percutaneous anatomic ligament reconstruction. The ligament remnant and anatomical localization point can be observed directly by using an arthroscope. Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction can be a more viable alternative for patients with chronic ankle instability due to its minimal disturbance to the stump of the ligament and reduced operative aggression.

Indexed as

Ankle JointArthroscopyJoint InstabilityLateral Ligament, AnkleAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultArthroscopic lateral ligament reconstructionChronic ankle instabilityPercutaneous anatomic ligament reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39543618
PMCPMC11566172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.