ArticleBMC public health2024
Impact of New York City's 4-year multi-component natural experiment to improve elementary school physical education on student cardiorespiratory fitness.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Annual School Fitness Reports on Students' Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of Parental Reporting.Pediatric exercise science · 2026Article
- Structural imbalance in youth weight management policies in China: a three-dimensional analysis of school responsibility and collaborative support.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Trends in 4th-12th grade students' aerobic capacity and muscular strength and endurance: New York City public school students, 2006-2019.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Data Missingness and Equity Implications in the Nation's Largest Student Fitness Surveillance System: The New York City School Based Physical Fitness Testing Programs, 2006-2020.The Journal of school health · 2025Observational
- A pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial of an audit, feedback, and coaching intervention on compliance with elementary physical education laws and student physical activity during lesson time.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchool physical education is an important population-level health intervention for improving youth fitness. This study estimated the impact of New York City's PE Works program - which included providing PE teachers, training for classroom teachers, and administrative/ teacher support for PE - on student cardiorespiratory fitness as measured by the FitnessGram's 15-meter PACER test for aerobic capacity.
methodsThis longitudinal study (2014/15-2018/19) includes 581 elementary schools (n = 315,999 4th /5th -grade students; 84% non-white; 74% who qualify for free or reduced-price meals, a proxy for socioeconomic status). We apply the parametric g-formula to address schools' time-varying exposure to intervention components and time-varying confounding.
resultsAfter four years of staggered PE Works implementation, 49.7% of students/school (95% CI: 42.6%, 54.2%) met age/sex-specific Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ) aerobic capacity standards set by the FitnessGram. Had PE Works not been implemented, we estimate 45.7% (95% CI: 36.9%, 52.1%) would have met aerobic capacity HFZ standards. Had PE Works been fully implemented in all schools from the program's inception, we estimate 57.4% (95% CI: 49.1%, 63.3%) would have met aerobic capacity HFZ standards. Adding a PE teacher, alone, had the largest impact (6.4% (95% CI: 1.0, 12.0) increase).
conclusionPE Works positively impacted student cardiorespiratory fitness. Mandating and funding multicomponent PE programs is an important public health intervention to increase children's cardiorespiratory fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.