Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543590›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study.

Ákos Mikolicz, Botond Simon, Aida Roudgari, Arvin Shahbazi, János Vág

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05349942 (A Digital Method for Measurement of Palatal Asymmetry in Twins), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05349942 nacompletednot on this map

A Digital Method for Measurement of Palatal Asymmetry in Twins

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled201ConditionsIdentity, Body, Palate, DeformityArmsIntraoral scanning and data acquisition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ákos Mikolicz *Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Botond Simon *Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. simon.botond.barna@semmelweis.hu.
Aida RoudgariDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Arvin ShahbaziDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
János VágDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

American Society of Forensic Odontology Research Grant 2022Hungarian Human Resources Development Operational Program EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006Hungarian Scientific Research Fund K_22, 142142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to validate a machine learning algorithm previously developed in a training population on a different randomly chosen population (i.e., test set). The discrimination potential of the palatal intraoral scan-based geometric and superimposition methods was evaluated.

methodsA total of 23 participants (16 females and seven males) from different countries underwent palatal scans using the Emerald intraoral scanner. Geometric-based identification involved measuring the height, width, and depth of the palatal vault in each scan. These parameters were then input into Fisher's linear discriminant equations with coefficients determined previously on a training set. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For the superimposition method, scan repeatability was compared to between-subjects differences, calculating mean absolute differences (MAD) between aligned scans. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the effects of sex, longitude, and latitude of country of origin on concordance.

resultsThe geometric-based method achieved 91.2% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity, consistent with the results from the training set, showing no significant difference. Latitude and longitude did not significantly affect geometric-based matches. In the superimposition method, the between-subjects MAD range (1.068-0.214 mm) and the repeatability range (0.011-0.093 mm) did not overlap. MAD was minimally affected by longitude and not influenced by latitude. The sex determination function recognized females over males with 69.0% sensitivity, similar to the training set. However, the specificity (62.5%) decreased.

conclusionsThe assessment of geometric and superimposition discrimination has unequivocally demonstrated its robust reliability, remaining impervious to population. In contrast, the distinction between sexes carries only moderate reliability. The significant correlation observed among longitude, latitude, and palatal height suggests the feasibility of a comprehensive large-scale study to determine one's country of origin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Portable intraoral scanners can aid forensic investigations as adjunct identification methods by applying the proposed discriminant function to palatal geometry without population restrictions.

trial registrationThe Clinicatrial.gov registration number is NCT05349942 (27/04/2022).

Indexed as

Machine LearningPalateAdultFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityGeometryHuman identificationIntraoral scannerMachine learningPalateSex

Identifiers

PMID39543590
PMCPMC11566520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.