ArticleBMC oral health2024
Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05349942 (A Digital Method for Measurement of Palatal Asymmetry in Twins), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Digital Method for Measurement of Palatal Asymmetry in Twins
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based sex estimation using palatal morphometry acquired from digital impressions.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- A mathematical model for scientifically defining the class characteristics of the human anterior maxilla-Part 1: The dental arch.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Correction: Human identification via digital palatal scans: a machine learning validation pilot study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to validate a machine learning algorithm previously developed in a training population on a different randomly chosen population (i.e., test set). The discrimination potential of the palatal intraoral scan-based geometric and superimposition methods was evaluated.
methodsA total of 23 participants (16 females and seven males) from different countries underwent palatal scans using the Emerald intraoral scanner. Geometric-based identification involved measuring the height, width, and depth of the palatal vault in each scan. These parameters were then input into Fisher's linear discriminant equations with coefficients determined previously on a training set. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For the superimposition method, scan repeatability was compared to between-subjects differences, calculating mean absolute differences (MAD) between aligned scans. Multiple linear regression analysis determined the effects of sex, longitude, and latitude of country of origin on concordance.
resultsThe geometric-based method achieved 91.2% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity, consistent with the results from the training set, showing no significant difference. Latitude and longitude did not significantly affect geometric-based matches. In the superimposition method, the between-subjects MAD range (1.068-0.214 mm) and the repeatability range (0.011-0.093 mm) did not overlap. MAD was minimally affected by longitude and not influenced by latitude. The sex determination function recognized females over males with 69.0% sensitivity, similar to the training set. However, the specificity (62.5%) decreased.
conclusionsThe assessment of geometric and superimposition discrimination has unequivocally demonstrated its robust reliability, remaining impervious to population. In contrast, the distinction between sexes carries only moderate reliability. The significant correlation observed among longitude, latitude, and palatal height suggests the feasibility of a comprehensive large-scale study to determine one's country of origin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Portable intraoral scanners can aid forensic investigations as adjunct identification methods by applying the proposed discriminant function to palatal geometry without population restrictions.
trial registrationThe Clinicatrial.gov registration number is NCT05349942 (27/04/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.