Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543545›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Perspective matters in recovery: the views of persons with severe mental illness, family and mental health professionals on collaboration during recovery, a qualitative study.

Thijs J Burger, Robin M van Eck, Marjolein Lachmeijer, Kimriek R G de Wilde-Schutten, Mette Lansen, Carola van Alphen, Niek van Haasteren, Karin Groen, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thijs J BurgerArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands. Thijs.burger@arkin.nl.
Robin M van EckArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Marjolein LachmeijerArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Kimriek R G de Wilde-SchuttenArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Mette LansenAnoiksis, Association for Persons With Psychosis Susceptibility, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carola van AlphenAnoiksis, Association for Persons With Psychosis Susceptibility, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niek van HaasterenYpsilon, Association for Family and Network Members of Persons With Psychosis Susceptibility, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Karin GroenYpsilon, Association for Family and Network Members of Persons With Psychosis Susceptibility, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Frederike SchirmbeckDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Astrid VellingaArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Martijn J KikkertArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Jack DekkerArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.
Mariken B de KoningArkin, Institute for Mental Health, Afdeling Onderzoek, Klaprozenweg 111, Amsterdam, 1033NN, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 636330002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovery from severe mental illness, including psychosis has been described as a personal and unique process, but it rarely is a journey undertaken without profound influences of significant others (family, mental health professionals). Diverging perspectives between persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals are frequent during the recovery process, notably in psychotic disorders. We aimed to explore processes of collaboration during recovery, to inform recovery supporting practices.

methodsCurrent qualitative study had a participatory design and was set within long-term mental healthcare for severe mental illness. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with persons with severe mental illness (most had a history of psychosis), family and professionals on their mutual contact during recovery. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed themes representing processes of collaboration during recovery.

resultsWe described roles persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals attribute to each other in mutually influential terms of unconditional and meaningful contact (which takes time to establish) and problem-oriented aspects. Secondly, experienced differences over problem definition, "needing help" and consequently over the role parties attribute to one another, may result in negative interactions, in the area of having expectations; (not) informing; (not) having agency to change; experiencing (dis)agreement or struggle.

conclusionsunconditional, meaningful contact and knowing each other's perspective are important to fruitful interaction in a triad when perspectives on mental health problems diverge. Relationally centered and process oriented care with continuity of family and professionals involved are needed to advance recovery in severe mental illness, especially psychosis.

Indexed as

FamilyMental DisordersQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersCommunity mental healthFamily involvementInsightLong-term careNetwork approachPsychiatric rehabilitationPsychosisSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID39543545
PMCPMC11566249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.