Trial reportBMC cancer2024
The efficacy and safety of the prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF in radiotherapy with weekly concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of four long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for primary prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer: a prospective observational cohort study in China.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Long-term effects of using pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor following chemotherapy: A real-world study on patients with ovarian cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Cost effectiveness analysis of PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy induced neutropenia in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma using real world data.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- miR-193a-5p-mediated Inhibition of the METTL1/COX-2 axis is critical for Astragalin-induced apoptosis in cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing neutropenia during concurrent radiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.
methodsFrom September 2019 to November 2020, 180 patients with cervical cancer who required concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the following three groups at a ratio of 1:1:1: Group A (PEG-rhG-CSF), Group B (PEG-rhG-CSF + rhG-CSF) and the control group (rhG-CSF). Cisplatin or carboplatin was administered weekly. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), delay of radiotherapy, chemotherapy dose reduction, rate of PFS at 2 years and 3 years, and incidence of adverse reactions.
resultsSixty patients were randomly assigned to each group. Two patients in Group B withdrew from the trial for personal reasons. The incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly lower than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia in the Control group was significantly greater than that in Group A and Group B (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of FN among the three groups (P = 0.771). The rate of platinum dose reduction in Group A (6.7%) and Group B (5.2%) was significantly lower than that in the Control group (30.0%) (P < 0.001). The delay rate of radiotherapy in Group A (10%) and Group B (13.8%) was obviously inferior to that in the Control group (31.7%) (P = 0.006). The 2-year PFS rates of Group A, Group B, and the Control group were 93.3%, 98.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.270). The 3-year PFS rates were 89.8%, 94.1%, and 84.9%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.178). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in any of the patients.
conclusionIn Group A and Group B, The prophylactic application of PEG-rhG-CSF during conventional chemoradiotherapy combined with weekly chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions when compared to Control group.
trial registrationchictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900026309, registered 29 September 2019-prospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.