ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Prevalence and predictors of episiotomy among puerperal women accessing postnatal care in the Kumasi Metropolis.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Episiotomy practice and perineal outcomes in low risk vaginal deliveries: comparing a hospital attached birth center and delivery suite in Beirut, Lebanon.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Determinants of puerperal sepsis among mothers who give birth at Jigjiga Public Hospitals, Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: a facility-based unmatched case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Rectal Versus Oral Diclofenac for Perineal Pain Relief following Episiotomy Repair at a Tertiary Hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria: A randomized controlled study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the prevalence and predictors of episiotomy among puerperal women accessing postnatal care in the Kumasi Metropolis.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1750 postnatal mothers who had spontaneous vaginal using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were conducted to show the rate of episiotomy. Chi-square and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted using Jamovi software version 2.5.3.
resultsThe prevalence of episiotomy among the study population was 49.7% compared to the 10% of all deliveries recommended by World Health Organisation (WHO). Among those who had an episiotomy, 88.5% gave consent, and 77.6% required repairs. In the bivariate analysis educational status, age, perineal tearing, marital status, household monthly income, spontaneous vaginal deliveries and previous episiotomy had a significant association with episiotomy risk. In the multivariate analysis, married women, lower education levels, moderate household incomes, grand multiparous women, spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), instrumental deliveries, longer second stages of labour, and attending more antenatal care (ANC) sessions were all associated with a reduced likelihood of episiotomy. Higher one-minute Apgar scores and anemia also lowered the odds. Conversely, hypertensives, women with four or more previous vaginal deliveries, and those with a history of episiotomy were more likely to undergo the procedure.
conclusionEpisiotomies conducted was high, indicating potential overuse compared to WHO's recommendations. Antenatal attendance and timing should be prioritised to improve maternal preparation and outcomes. Policy interventions to reduce unnecessary episiotomies are needed. Midwifery education must also emphasise the importance of respectful maternity care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.