ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Evaluation of fetal heart size, morphology and function with fetal growth restriction using fetal HQ.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiac Function in Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Cardiac Function Between Uncomplicated Monozygotic Twins and Singleton Fetuses in the Second Trimester by Fetal HQ: A Pilot Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Automated interpretation of fetal cardiac function evaluation from the echocardiogram.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The Impact of Fetal Growth Restriction on Myocardial Development from Fetal Life to Early Childhood: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Normobaric High-Flow Oxygen Therapy Combined with Low Molecular Weight Heparin in the Management of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with various perinatal complications. Limited research has focused on the fetal heart in the context of FGR. This study aimed to investigate the application value of fetal heart quantification (HQ) technology in evaluating the size, morphology, and function of the heart in FGR.
methodsA total of 31 fetuses diagnosed with FGR in our hospital from April 2022 to May 2024 were included, alongside another 31 normal fetuses matched for gestational age as the control group. Ultrasound Doppler parameters of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), umbilical artery (UA), venous catheter, and fetal HQ parameters were collected for comparative analysis, and perinatal data were followed up.
resultsFetuses with FGR exhibited significant differences in various parameters of the MCA and UA compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The four-chamber view end-diastolic transverse width, end-diastolic area, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-systolic length, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and right ventricular (RV) end-systolic area in the FGR group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the 24-segment analysis, the LV fractional shortening in the FGR group was greater than in the control group at segments 12 to 14, while the end-diastolic diameter (ED) at segments 5 to 13 of the LV and segments 1 to 14 of the RV were smaller than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Analysis of each subgroup indicated that fractional shortening (FS) in the early-onset group was significantly greater than in the late-onset group at RV segments 2 to 8. LV-ED at segments 1 to 15 and RV-ED at segments 1 to 16 were significantly smaller in the early-onset group than in the control group, and LV ED segments 20 to 21 were significantly smaller in the early-onset group compared to the late-onset group (P < 0.05). FS in the mild group was significantly larger than in the normal group at LV segments 10 to 16. The severe group exhibited significantly smaller LV segment 2 to 11 ED and the mild group showed smaller RV segments 1 to 13 compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionsFetal HQ is a promising technique for evaluating the cardiac function, size, and morphology in cases of FGR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.