ArticleBMC nephrology2024
Treatment discontinuation in adults with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS): a qualitative study of international experts' perspectives with associated cost-consequence analysis.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of genetic and epigenetic biomarkers involved in the occurrence of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and its therapeutic strategies.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Advances in Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic advances in eculizumab for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Which Factors Influence Decisions to Withdraw from Eculizumab: A Qualitative Study of Patients Diagnosed with aHUS.The patient · 2026Article
- Establishing a rapid-response multidisciplinary service for thrombotic microangiopathies using a model of improvement framework: perspectives from a Brazilian quaternary hospital.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Academia Europaea's guidelines for the visualization of clinical outcomes.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System perspective of adults with long-standing atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Review of Complement Dysregulation, Genetic Susceptibility and Multiorgan Involvement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Real-World effectiveness of eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a retrospective study from Western China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) related to congenital mutations impeding control of the alternative pathway of complement. Following approval of the complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration, initial guidelines suggested lifelong therapy. Yet, growing evidence indicates that discontinuation of eculizumab, or its long-acting form ravulizumab, is possible for many patients. This mixed-methods study sought to explore international experts' perspectives and experiences related to treatment duration in adult patients with aHUS, while also estimating the financial and potential health consequences of early discontinuation.
methodsBetween January and December 2023, we conducted 10 qualitative interviews with experts in the treatment of aHUS, based upon which we constructed a quantitative decision tree, designed to estimate time on treatment and treatment- and disease-related adverse events.
resultsThematic analysis of the interview data identified four main themes: (1) Concerns and prior experience; (2) High-risk vs. low-risk groups; (3) Patient preference and adherence; and (4) Funding for monitoring and re-treatment. Although most interviewees were in favour of considering treatment discontinuation for many patients (citing the high cost, burden, and potential side effects of lifelong treatment as key reasons), a prior negative experience of discontinuation seemed to make others more reluctant to stop. Deciding which patients required lifelong treatment and which not involved consideration of a wide range of factors, including patient- and system-related factors. Cost-consequence analysis demonstrated the financial savings associated with early treatment discontinuation at the expense of increased risk of recurrent TMA events. Close monitoring for these events had the potential to minimise any long-term injury, primarily renal, with an estimated one event per 100 patient years. For patients at high risk of TMA and with poor adherence to monitoring, rates of renal injury rose to three events per 100 patient years.
conclusionsaHUS treatment protocols are changing globally in response to new clinical evidence. Against this backdrop, our mixed-methods study provides compelling evidence on the complexity of factors influencing treatment discontinuation decisions in aHUS, as well as the financial and health consequences of early discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.