ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Risk factors and prognostic impact of new decompensated events in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traveling with chronic viral hepatitis.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2026Review
- Child-Pugh Stage Predicts Survival in Hospitalized Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: A 10-Year Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distinct gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles in HBV-related liver cirrhosis: insights into disease progression.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecompensated cirrhosis (DC) is prone to recurrent episodes of decompensation following the initial event. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for subsequent decompensation and assess their impact on the outcomes of patients hospitalized for DC.
methodsPatients with DC were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of new decompensated events during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for new decompensation. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between new decompensation and short-term mortality risk in these patients.
resultsThe study cohort consisted of 339 patients with DC, with a median age of 57 years. During hospitalization, 83 patients (24.5%) experienced new decompensated events, with bacterial infections (BIs) being the most common (n = 46, 13.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.005) was the sole risk factor for new decompensation during hospitalization. Patients who experienced new decompensation had significantly higher 28-day (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (33.7% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) transplant-free mortality compared to those who did not. After adjusting for white cell count, C-reactive protein, and MELD score, new decompensation during hospitalization was identified as an independent risk factor for 28-day and 90-day mortality (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.42-4.87, P = 0.002 and HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.88, P = 0.033, respectively).
conclusionsPatients with high MELD scores are susceptible to new decompensation during hospitalization, and the occurrence of new decompensation adversely affects short-term mortality in patients with DC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.