ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Novel approaches to define responders to interventional treatment in hypertension: insights from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF and HTN-ON MED trials.
Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the appropriate use of renal denervation systems in Japan: endorsed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS), and their positioning in the JSH 2025 guidelines.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Guideline
- Repositioning renal denervation in resistant hypertension: evidence-based insights, stratified decision-making, and implementation pathways.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Association between arterial stiffness and long-term efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation: 5-year results of the ASORAS study.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Renal Denervation in Asia: 2025 Asia Renal Denervation Consortium (ARDeC) Consensus Statement Endorsed by the Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Review
- Renal Denervation After USA FDA Approval: An Update from an Interventional Cardiologist's Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sham-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated significant reductions in both office and 24-h blood pressure (BP) following radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) in the uncontrolled hypertension population. Notably, the blood pressure response varies widely within individual participants, thus showing a clinical need to identify potential RDN "responders" prior to the procedure. Despite multiple analytic efforts, no single parameter, aside from baseline blood pressure, has been consistently associated with BP reduction following RDN. However, this failure may be due to limitations in empiric definitions of responders. Indeed, commonly applied responder definitions based on the difference between two point-in-time BP measurements are fraught due to visit-to-visit variability in office and 24-h blood pressure endpoints. Several factors should be considered to develop a more clinically useful operational definition of procedural response including relative changes in office and 24-h BP, consideration of the temporal response to RDN, as well as adjustment for baseline BP. The current evidence may provide incentives for future expert consensus to precisely define responders to hypertension treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.