ArticleScientific reports2024
A new approach for sex prediction by evaluating mandibular arch and canine dimensions with machine-learning classifiers and intraoral scanners (a retrospective study).
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Sex Estimation from Canine Measurements on Panoramic Radiographs: Comparison with Manual Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of sex estimation from human tooth volume: leveraging automated AI segmentation and comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based sex estimation using palatal morphometry acquired from digital impressions.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Classifying Sex from MSCT-Derived 3D Mandibular Models Using an Adapted PointNet++ Deep Learning Approach in a Croatian Population.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Models to Logistic Regression Model Using Tooth-Related Factors to Predict the Outcome of Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex estimation with parameters of the facial canal by computed tomography using machine learning algorithms and artificial neural networks.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In circumstances where antemortem information concerning the deceased individual is unavailable, forensic experts prepare biological profiling for unidentified human remains that aids in narrowing the search for identity. Biological profiling includes basic demographic information such as sex, age, stature, and ethnicity. Sex identification is the first and key step in the biological profiling of unidentified human remains, as it effectively reduces potential matches by excluding nearly one-half of the suspected cases and facilitates the subsequent stages. This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting sex by analysing mandibular canine dimensions, mandibular intercanine distance (MICD), and mandibular canine index (MCI) obtained from three-dimensional (3D) digital impressions captured by using an intraoral scanner (IOS). The results of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) test indicated that mean mandibular canine width (MeanMCW) had the highest sexual dimorphism with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.912, and the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) classifier demonstrated the highest testing accuracy among all machine learning (ML) models, achieving an accuracy of 92.5%. While the outcomes of this study are promising, further studies are imperative to validate these findings with larger sample sizes in different ethnic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.