SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Comparative effects of different beverages on weight loss in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial and Other Non-Nutritive Sweeteners, the Microbiome, and Cardiometabolic Health.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of clarity on the comparative effects of different beverages on weight loss in adults.
objectiveThis study aimed at quantifying and ranking the effects of different beverages on weight loss.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 2023. We included randomized trials evaluating the comparative effects of two or more beverages, or compared a beverage against a control group (water, no intervention), for weight loss in adults. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) with a Bayesian framework to estimate mean difference [MD] and 95% credible interval [CrI].
resultsIn total, 78 randomized trials with 4168 participants were eligible. Low/no-calorie sweetened beverages (LNCSB) was effective for weight loss compared with water (MD: -0.79 kg, 95% CrI: -1.35, -0.18), milk (MD: -0.80 kg, 95% CrI: -1.59, -0.01), fruit juice (MD: -0.83 kg, 95% CrI: -1.47, -0.13), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (MD: -1.08 kg, 95% CrI: -1.65, -0.50), and no intervention (MD: -1.19 kg, 95% CrI: -1.93, -0.41). However, in sensitivity analyses, no significant effect was seen in trials with a low risk of bias and those that implemented calorie restriction. LNCSB drinking was effective for waist circumference reduction compared with water (MD: -1.85 cm, 95% CrI: -3.47, -0.22). The certainty of evidence from most comparisons was rated low.
conclusionsThis study suggested evidence of low certainty that intake of LNCSBs can result in a small weight loss when used as a substitute for other beverages. Considering the low certainty of evidence, more research is needed to compare the effects of different beverages on body weight.
trial registrationNot applicable, but the protocol of this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023407937).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39543378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.