ArticleScientific reports2024
A UAV path planning method based on the framework of multi-objective jellyfish search algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Strategy Improved Pied Kingfisher Optimizer for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Lie group-based hybrid optimization framework for multi-objective UAV path planning using L-VGWO.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive airspace allocation model for urban drone logistics using multi-objective optimization under uncertainty.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-strategy hybrid adaptive dung beetle optimization for UAV photogrammetric 3D path planning under complex constraints.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dynamic path planning of UAV with least inflection point based on adaptive neighborhood A* algorithm and multi-strategy fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-objective optimization model for dynamic airspace allocation of urban drones in medical emergency delivery.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-constraint UAV path planning problems can be viewed as many-objective optimization problems that can be solved by meta-heuristic algorithms with good self-organizing optimization capabilities. However, such algorithms mostly use random initializing methods, resulting in low-quality initial paths that reduce the efficiency of subsequent algorithmic searches. Moreover, as the number of objective functions increases, meta-heuristic algorithms face inadequate selection pressure and convergence capability, which lead to poor solution. In order to address these issues, this paper proposes a UAV path planning method based on the framework of multi-objective jellyfish search algorithm (UMOJS). Firstly, an initializing strategy based on Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRT) is proposed to achieve higher quality initial paths. Secondly, a jellyfish updating strategy guided by the class-optimal individual is designed to enhance the convergence ability of the algorithm. Furthermore, a set of predefined reference points is imported to obtain Pareto optimal solutions with better convergence and distribution in many-objective optimization problems. To evaluate the superiority of the proposed UMOJS algorithm, three different difficulties of simulated flight environments are constructed to verify its performance. The experimental results show that UMOJS is not only able to gain more UAV paths with shorter length, but also more evenly distributed Pareto optimal solutions compared to five meta-heuristic algorithms when the constraint conditions are satisfied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.