ArticleScientific reports2024
Contribution of remote Pacinian corpuscles to flutter-range frequency discrimination in humans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the various classes of fast-adapting (FA) tactile afferents found in hairy and glabrous skin, FA2 afferents, associated with Pacinian corpuscles (PC), preferentially signal high-frequency sinusoidal events corresponding with vibration percepts, in contrast to other classes associated with lower frequency flutter percepts. The FA2-PC complex is also uniquely sensitive to distant sources of vibration mechanically transmitted through anatomical structures. In the present study, we used a pulsatile waveform to assess the contribution of FA2 afferents to the perception of flutter-range frequency stimuli (~ 20 Hz) in combination with two methods to abolish local FA inputs and force a dependence on FA2 via transmission from adjacent structures. Firstly, we examined frequency discrimination and perception of vibration applied to the hairy skin overlying the ulnar styloid before and during the blockade of intradermal receptors by local anaesthesia. Secondly, we tested frequency discrimination on the digital glabrous skin before and during the blockade of myelinated fibres by ulnar nerve compression. Despite reliance on vibration transmission to activate remote PCs, we found that flutter-range frequency discrimination was unimpeded across both skin types. Comparisons with stimuli applied to the contralateral side also indicated that perceived frequency was unaffected. This confirms that flutter-range frequency perception can be encoded by the FA2-PC system. Our results demonstrate that input from receptors specialised for low-frequency signalling is not mandatory for flutter-range frequency perception. This explains how the constancy of frequency perception might be achieved across different skin regions, irrespective of the afferent type activated for transmitting these signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.