ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of impact of limb segment length variations during reinforcement learning in four-legged robot.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crawling robots are becoming increasingly prevalent in both industrial and private applications. Despite their many advantages over other robot types, they have complex movement mechanics. Artificial intelligence can simplify this by reinforcement learning. This process requires configuring the training environment and defining input parameters, including a robot model for movement training. To translate the virtual results into real-world scenarios, a 3D model with appropriate mechanical parameters must be developed.These parameters can vary significantly between multiple mechanical configurations, which will further impact the reinforcement learning process of such a robot. For this reason, it was decided to test which limb configurations would work best in this process. Initially, various kinematic types of walking robots were analysed, drawing on the anatomy of mammals, reptiles, and insects for the biological model. The reptilian model was chosen for its balance of stability, dynamics, and energy efficiency. The article reviews the preparation of robot models and the configuration of the Unity3D development environment using the ML-Agents toolkit. The experiment examined how different limb lengths affect training, resulting in movement algorithms for various quadruped robot configurations using artificial neural networks. Based on the numerical results, the best configuration was the default, with the same length of the tibia as the thigh, achieving a reward function value of 883.9 and an episode length of 245.5. Taking into account the same criteria, the least efficient configuration was definitely the one characterised by the shortest thigh and the longest tibia among those considered. In its case, the reward function reached a value of only 526.2 with an episode lasting 999.0, which means that it never achieved the intended goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.