Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543343›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automated video-based pain recognition in cats using facial landmarks.

George Martvel, Teddy Lazebnik, Marcelo Feighelstein, Lea Henze, Sebastian Meller, Ilan Shimshoni, Friederike Twele, Alexandra Schütter, Nora Foraita, Sabine Kästner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

George MartvelInformation Systems Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Teddy LazebnikDepartment of Mathematics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Marcelo FeighelsteinInformation Systems Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Lea HenzeDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Sebastian MellerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Ilan ShimshoniInformation Systems Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Friederike TweleDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Alexandra SchütterDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Nora ForaitaDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Sabine KästnerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Lauren FinkaCats Protection, National Cat Centre, Chelwood Gate, Sussex, UK.
Stelio P L LunaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel S MillsSchool of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Bank Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Anna ZamanskyInformation Systems Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. annazam@is.haifa.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective states are reflected in the facial expressions of all mammals. Facial behaviors linked to pain have attracted most of the attention so far in non-human animals, leading to the development of numerous instruments for evaluating pain through facial expressions for various animal species. Nevertheless, manual facial expression analysis is susceptible to subjectivity and bias, is labor-intensive and often necessitates specialized expertise and training. This challenge has spurred a growing body of research into automated pain recognition, which has been explored for multiple species, including cats. In our previous studies, we have presented and studied artificial intelligence (AI) pipelines for automated pain recognition in cats using 48 facial landmarks grounded in cats' facial musculature, as well as an automated detector of these landmarks. However, so far automated recognition of pain in cats used solely static information obtained from hand-picked single images of good quality. This study takes a significant step forward in fully automated pain detection applications by presenting an end-to-end AI pipeline that requires no manual efforts in the selection of suitable images or their landmark annotation. By working with video rather than still images, this new pipeline approach also optimises the temporal dimension of visual information capture in a way that is not practical to preform manually. The presented pipeline reaches over 70% and 66% accuracy respectively in two different cat pain datasets, outperforming previous automated landmark-based approaches using single frames under similar conditions, indicating that dynamics matter in cat pain recognition. We further define metrics for measuring different dimensions of deficiencies in datasets with animal pain faces, and investigate their impact on the performance of the presented pain recognition AI pipeline.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFacial ExpressionVideo RecordingAnimalsCatsFaceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMalePainPain MeasurementPattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID39543343
PMCPMC11564822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.