Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543340›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

NEIVATECH pilot study: immersive virtual reality training in older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching.

Luis Leal-Vega, M ª Begoña Coco-Martín, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Rubén Cuadrado-Asensio, Ana I Vallelado-Álvarez, Hortensia Sánchez-Tocino, Agustín Mayo-Íscar, Carlos J Hernández-Rodríguez, Juan F Arenillas Lara, David P Piñero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819386 (Prospective Pilot Study of the NEIVATECH Virtual Reality-based System to Improve Visual Function in Children with Amblyopia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819386 naterminatednot on this map

Prospective Pilot Study of the NEIVATECH Virtual Reality-based System to Improve Visual Function in Children with Amblyopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncrease-TechRan2022 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsAmblyopiaArmsActive vision therapy sessions with the NEIVATECH Virtual Reality-based system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis Leal-VegaApplied Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47005, Spain.
M ª Begoña Coco-MartínApplied Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47005, Spain. mbcoco@uva.es.
Ainhoa Molina-MartínGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, 03016, Spain.
Rubén Cuadrado-AsensioInstitute of Applied Ophthalmobiology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47011, Spain.
Ana I Vallelado-ÁlvarezDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinical Hospital, Valladolid, 47003, Spain.
Hortensia Sánchez-TocinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, 47012, Spain.
Agustín Mayo-ÍscarInstitute for Research in Mathematics, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47011, Spain.
Carlos J Hernández-RodríguezGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, 03016, Spain.
Juan F Arenillas LaraApplied Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, 47005, Spain.
David P PiñeroGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, 03016, Spain.

Funding

Centre for the Development of Industrial Technology of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities IDI-20181232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immersive virtual reality (VR) is recently being explored as a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of amblyopia. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, safety, usability and satisfaction obtained with the use of a novel VR system (NEIVATECH) to provide binocular vision training in previously treated older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching. A prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, pilot study was conducted in which the intervention under study was 9 h of therapy with the NEIVATECH system, distributed in 18 half-hour sessions spread over 1 month. A comprehensive visual assessment was conducted before and after the intervention, and at the end of the intervention the safety and usability of the system and patient satisfaction were evaluated. After therapy, statistically significant differences were observed in the near best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the dominant (p = 0.022) and non-dominant (p = 0.022) eye, in stereopsis based on the Binocular Function Score (p = 0.045) and in the break (p = 0.012) and recovery (p = 0.009) points of negative fusional vergence for distance vision. The safety and usability of the system and patient satisfaction with the therapy were adequate. These findings support further investigation of this treatment option in future studies incorporating a control group with which to compare the results obtained. Trial registration: NCT04819386.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVirtual RealityVisual AcuityChildFemaleHumansMalePatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyVision, BinocularAmblyopiaDichoptic trainingGamificationPerceptual learningVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39543340
PMCPMC11564513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.