Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543332›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identification of novel PAD2 inhibitors using pharmacophore-based virtual screening, molecular docking, and MD simulation studies.

Prakash Jha, Prerna Rajoria, Priya Poonia, Madhu Chopra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prakash JhaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Anti-Cancer Drug Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Prerna RajoriaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Anti-Cancer Drug Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Priya PooniaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Anti-Cancer Drug Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Madhu ChopraLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Anti-Cancer Drug Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India. mchopra@acbr.du.ac.in.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/PR40153/BTIS/137/8/2021Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DBT/2021-22/CBR/1593Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DST/INSPIRE/03/2016/000026Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research and the Institute of Eminence, University of Delhi IoE/2023-24/12/FRP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the realm of epigenetic regulation, Protein arginine deiminase 2 (PAD2) stands out as a therapeutic target due to its significant role in neurological disorders, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), and various cancers. To date, no in silico studies have focused on PAD2 for lead compound identification. Therefore, we conducted structure-based pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and essential dynamics studies using PCA and free energy landscape analyses to identify repurposed drugs and selective inhibitors against PAD2. The best pharmacophore model, 'Pharm_01,' had a selectivity score of 10.485 and an excellent ROC curve quality of 0.972. Pharm1 consisted of three hydrogen bond donors (HBD) and two hydrophobic (Hy) features (DDDHH). A virtual screening of about 9.2 million compounds yielded 2575 hits using a fit value threshold of 2.5 and drug-likeness criteria. Molecular docking identified the top ten molecules, which were verified using MD simulations. Stability was verified using MM-PBSA studies, whereas conformational differences were investigated using PCA and free energy landscape analyses. Two hits (Leads 1 and 2) from the DrugBank dataset showed promise for repurposing as PAD2 inhibitors, while one hit compound (Lead 8) from the ZINC database emerged as a novel PAD2 inhibitor. These findings indicate that the discovered compounds may be potent PAD2 inhibitors, necessitating additional preclinical and clinical research to produce viable treatments for cancer and neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansHydrogen BondingPharmacophoreProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 2Enzyme InhibitorsProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 2Drug repurposingMD simulationPAD2PCA analysesStructure-based Pharmacophore ModelVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID39543332
PMCPMC11564549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.