ArticleScientific reports2024
Multi-strategy cooperative enhancement dung beetle optimizer and its application in obstacle avoidance navigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Strategy Improved Dung Beetle Optimizer for High-Dimensional Optimization and Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Dynamic Multi-Niche Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm and Its Application to Robot Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-strategy improved lemur optimiser for global optimisation and engineering applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Improved Crested Porcupine Optimization Algorithm Incorporating Butterfly Search and Triangular Walk Strategies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-fault diagnosis and damage assessment of rolling bearings based on IDBO-VMD and CNN-BiLSTM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Improved Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm for Collaborative 3D Path Planning of UAVs.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Path planning is a crucial component of unmanned driving systems designed to address the challenge of autonomous navigation. This article introduces a novel approach called the multi-strategy cooperative enhanced dung beetle optimization algorithm (RCDBO) and applies it to dispose of path planning issues. Its primary aim is to mitigate the shortcomings of the fundamental dung beetle optimization algorithm (DBO), namely, its tendency to prematurely converge to local optima and its limited global planning capability. Initially, population initialization leverages Bernoulli-based chaotic mapping to enhance diversity and ensure uniform randomness, thereby improving both the quality of initial solutions and optimization efficiency. Subsequently, a random walk strategy is employed to perturb the rolling behavior of the dung beetle population during the initial stage, thus mitigating potential algorithmic local stagnation. Finally, adopting a vertical and horizontal crossover strategy introduces perturbations to the current best value of the dung beetle population, thereby enhancing the DBO method's global optimization capability during the later stages of evolution. The RCDBO method was evaluated against several well-established swarm intelligence algorithms using twelve benchmark test functions, the CEC2021 test suite, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and the Friedman test, to rigorously assess its feasibility. Additionally, the effectiveness of each strategy within the RCDBO framework was validated, and the algorithm's capability to achieve an optimal balance between global exploration and local exploitation was systematically analyzed through the CEC2021 test suite. Furthermore, in path planning simulation experiments targeting maps of varying sizes and complexities, the RCDBO algorithm, compared to the basic DBO algorithm, results in shorter planned path lengths. In simpler map environments, it exhibits fewer turning points and smoother paths, indicating that the RCDBO algorithm also possesses certain advantages in addressing path-planning challenges.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.