Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Analysis of the impact of deep learning know-how and data in modelling neonatal EEG.

Aengus Daly, Gordon Lightbody, Andriy Temko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aengus DalyDepartment of Mathematics, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland. aengus.daly@mtu.ie.
Gordon LightbodyDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Andriy TemkoDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 15/RI/3239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance gains achieved by deep learning models nowadays are mainly attributed to the usage of ever larger datasets. In this study, we present and contrast the performance gains that can be achieved via accessing larger high-quality datasets versus the gains that can be achieved from harnessing the latest deep learning architectural and training advances. Modelling neonatal EEG is particularly affected by the lack of publicly available large datasets. It is shown that greater performance gains can be achieved from harnessing the latest deep learning advances than using a larger training dataset when adopting AUC as a metric, whereas using AUC90 or AUC-PR as metrics greater performance gains are achieved from using a larger dataset than harnessing the latest deep learning advances. In all scenarios the best performance is obtained by combining both deep learning advances and larger datasets. A novel developed architecture is presented that outperforms the current state-of-the-art model for the task of neonatal seizure detection. A novel method to fine-tune the presented model towards site-specific settings based on pseudo labelling is also outlined. The code and the weights of the model are made publicly available for benchmarking future model performances for neonatal seizure detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornSeizures

Identifiers

PMID39543245
PMCPMC11564755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.