Trial reportScientific reports2024
Impact of resistant starch type 3 on fecal microbiota and stool frequency in Thai adults with chronic constipation randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resistant starch as a dietary strategy for metabolic and gut health: Implications for Asia-Pacific populations.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Review
- Constipation in Older Adults: Pathophysiology, Clinical Impact, and Management Strategies.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Planetary health diet with einkorn as a potential preventive strategy to improve interdental microbiota, oral health and quality of life: a pilot clinical trial.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Nutritional, Antioxidant, and Phytochemical Changes During the Production of Tortillas Using Quality Protein Maize and an Alkaline Extrusion Thermomechanical Process.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Resistant Starch and Microbiota-Derived Secondary Metabolites: A Focus on Postbiotic Pathways in Gut Health and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Immunomodulatory role of gut microbial metabolites: mechanistic insights and therapeutic frontiers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Constipation poses a significant health concern affecting individuals of varying ages and geographic locations worldwide. While the impacts of numerous probiotics on constipation are well-characterized, there has been limited assessment of the potential prebiotic effects of resistant starches. We therefore conducted a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, clinical trial of resistant starch type 3 (RS-3) in Thai adults with self-reported chronic constipation. The effects of these mixed natural starch fibers on beneficial gut bacteria, bowel movements and stool consistency were evaluated after 6- and 12-week periods. Regardless of subject age, consumption of RS-3 compared to placebo resulted in significant improvements in gut health by dramatically increasing levels of beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Akkermansia and Megamonas) in the gut and relieving constipation. RS-3 consumption was associated with a significantly increased frequency of bowel movements, with subjects reporting these as healthy stools. Our findings provide important insights into the therapeutic advantages of RS-3 for constipation, and propose RS-3 as a feasible alternative strategy for management of constipation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.