ArticleScientific reports2024
Blockchain-based energy consumption approaches in IoT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy-Efficient Cryptographic Protocols for Sustainable IoT Security: A Federated Learning-Enhanced Lightweight Framework with Post-Quantum Resilience.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A unified low-carbon cybersecurity framework integrating energy-efficient intrusion detection, lightweight cryptography, and carbon-aware scheduling for edge-cloud architectures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Toward Energy-Efficient and Low-Carbon Intrusion Detection in Edge and Cloud Computing Based on GreenShield Cybersecurity Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Secure blockchain integrated deep learning framework for federated risk-adaptive and privacy-preserving IoT edge intelligence sets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A task decomposition and scheduling model for power IoT data acquisition with overlapping data efficiency optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blockchain is a decentralized electronic account book that is secure, open, and impervious to manipulation, and records transactions across numerous computers. Internet of Things (IoT) deployed sensors are limited in bandwidth, processing power, and battery life. Energy efficiency is a vital factor and a decisive matter for energy-bound IoT-based networks. This paper provides an idea of the working principle of blockchain technology in IoT-enabled energy systems. It investigates the fundamentals of blockchain technology, clarifying its decentralized nature, cryptographic mechanisms, and consensus algorithms that ensure data immutability and transparency. It explores how blockchain technology can be integrated with various IoT fields for energy efficiency. The paper investigates the blockchain-based energy consumption approaches in IoT qualitatively, and quantitatively with future research directions and challenges. It is seen that the hybrid blockchain model is suitable for energy efficiency in IoT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.