Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543179›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Revisiting the scorpion central nervous system using microCT.

Stephanie F Loria, Valentin L Ehrenthal, Lauren A Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie F LoriaInstitute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA. sloria@calacademy.org.
Valentin L EhrenthalMuseum of Nature Hamburg-Zoology, Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Hamburg, Germany.
Lauren A EspositoInstitute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) of Chelicerata has remained conserved since the Cambrian, yet few studies have examined its variability within chelicerate orders including Scorpiones. The scorpion CNS comprises the prosomal ganglion and opisthosomal ventral nerve cord. We visualize the scorpion CNS with microCT, explore morphological variation across taxa, compare the scorpion CNS to other arachnids, and create a terminology glossary and literature review to assist future studies. Six scorpion species were microCT scanned. Scan quality varied and most structures in the prosomal ganglion could only be observed in Paruroctonus becki (Vaejovidae). Major nerves and the first opisthosomal ganglion were visible in nearly all taxa. We present the most detailed 3D-rendering of the scorpion prosomal ganglion to date. Our results corroborate existing research and find the scorpion CNS to be conserved. Nearly all structures reported previously in the prosomal ganglion were located in similar positions in P. becki, and nerve morphology was conserved across examined families. Despite similarities, we report differences from the literature, observe taxonomic variation in prosomal ganglion shape, and confirm positional variation for the first opisthosomal ganglion. This study serves as a starting point for microCT analysis of the scorpion CNS, and future work should include more distantly related, size variable taxa to better elucidate these findings.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemScorpionsX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsArcuate bodyBrainCentral nervous systemMushroom bodyProsomal ganglionScorpions

Identifiers

PMID39543179
PMCPMC11564975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.