ArticleNature communications2024
START domains generate paralog-specific regulons from a single network architecture.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cryptic START domain regulates deeply conserved transcription factors.The Plant cell · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanisms driving functional divergence of transcription factor paralogs.The New phytologist · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional divergence of transcription factors (TFs) has driven cellular and organismal complexity throughout evolution, but its mechanistic drivers remain poorly understood. Here we test for new mechanisms using CORONA (CNA) and PHABULOSA (PHB), two functionally diverged paralogs in the CLASS III HOMEODOMAIN LEUCINE ZIPPER (HD-ZIPIII) family of TFs. We show that virtually all genes bound by PHB ( ~ 99%) are also bound by CNA, ruling out occupation of distinct sets of genes as a mechanism of functional divergence. Further, genes bound and regulated by both paralogs are almost always regulated in the same direction, ruling out opposite regulation of shared targets as a mechanistic driver. Functional divergence of CNA and PHB instead results from differential usage of shared binding sites, with hundreds of uniquely regulated genes emerging from a commonly bound genetic network. Regulation of a given gene by CNA or PHB is thus a function of whether a bound site is considered 'responsive' versus 'non-responsive' by each paralog. Discrimination between responsive and non-responsive sites is controlled, at least in part, by their lipid binding START domain. This suggests a model in which HD-ZIPIII TFs use information integrated by their START domain to generate paralog-specific transcriptional outcomes from a shared network architecture. Taken together, our study identifies a mechanism of HD-ZIPIII TF paralog divergence and proposes the ubiquitously distributed START evolutionary module as a driver of functional divergence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.